<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, Where Does Your Operation Go After Implementing Lean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://distributionblog.wallerassoc.com/2009/so-where-does-your-operation-go-after-implementing-lean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://distributionblog.wallerassoc.com/2009/so-where-does-your-operation-go-after-implementing-lean/</link>
	<description>Improving Your Supply Chain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 12:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dagen</title>
		<link>http://distributionblog.wallerassoc.com/2009/so-where-does-your-operation-go-after-implementing-lean/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributionblog.wallerassoc.com/?p=27#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Great post Douglas!  I think the key takeaway is that Lean and Six-Sigma alone are by no means “silver bullets.”  They can help you improve, but are just that – help.  They should not be the foundation.

Lean is a great methodology.  Six-Sigma has a great tool set.  Process Engineering is a more fundamental approach and can incorporate the others as a program.

Another complexity faced when trying to improve processes is having a great metric that truly represents the system’s reliability.

You mentioned both performance and quality; OEE and Process Reliability measure all three of the major contributing factors – performance, quality and availability.

Unfortunately, it is a common misconception that OEE measures machines or equipment.  Applied to the process, it is very effective and eye-opening.  In fact, both OEE and Process Reliability can be applied in a very manual environment such as a distribution center that has very little to no automation.

Just like “silver bullets,” there is no “golden metric.”  However, a strong process measure is a key to successfully engineering a process for optimal throughput and reliability.

Again, great post and thank you for the opportunity to chime in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Douglas!  I think the key takeaway is that Lean and Six-Sigma alone are by no means “silver bullets.”  They can help you improve, but are just that – help.  They should not be the foundation.</p>
<p>Lean is a great methodology.  Six-Sigma has a great tool set.  Process Engineering is a more fundamental approach and can incorporate the others as a program.</p>
<p>Another complexity faced when trying to improve processes is having a great metric that truly represents the system’s reliability.</p>
<p>You mentioned both performance and quality; OEE and Process Reliability measure all three of the major contributing factors – performance, quality and availability.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it is a common misconception that OEE measures machines or equipment.  Applied to the process, it is very effective and eye-opening.  In fact, both OEE and Process Reliability can be applied in a very manual environment such as a distribution center that has very little to no automation.</p>
<p>Just like “silver bullets,” there is no “golden metric.”  However, a strong process measure is a key to successfully engineering a process for optimal throughput and reliability.</p>
<p>Again, great post and thank you for the opportunity to chime in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
